1 Comment
User's avatar
David Lamson's avatar

I was hoping to find your most recent ARsquared post in order to comment, but as I don't see it in my feed, I will comment on that post (that I watched on YT) here.

Having followed politics (and its ugly underbelly) for nearly 50yrs, I see the WNBA kerfuffle as part of a larger OP. And that larger OP is to maintain division among the people. Various narratives are released, people argue, and no matter who seemingly prevails, the only winner is those who are running the OP. Both "sides" of the narrative lose, because sustaining division is itself the goal.

Regarding the narrative, most fall for the "race" division (and you are correct that only a single race exists- and, as a geneticist, I would add that all human skin is a shade of the same color, brown,) the primary division afflicting the WNBA is not racial, but ideological, "woke" vs "non-woke," regardless of whether an individual has "white" or "black" brown skin color. But, both sides of that ideological divide lose in the OP's overall successful strategy to maintain division. In fact, "woke" (formerly named social justice) ideology itself was invented and introduced (in the 1950's?) to demoralize populations and create division among people.

Once more understand we are being manipulated in order to keep us divided, perhaps more might abandon fighting amongst ourselves and, instead, unite to defeat the manipulators.

Expand full comment